Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chowky

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is for the article to be retained. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:02, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chowky

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NAD. This belongs to Wiktionary. ChunnuBhai (talk) 06:57, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why? we aren't allowed to have an article on a level of Indian police stations? In ictu oculi (talk) 08:56, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep there's no question about notability, and the nom has misunderstood the difference between having an article on something and a dictionary entry. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:18, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Chowky is kind of a small street police outpost. FITINDIA (talk) 20:32, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep geographic things like this have inherent notability. This appears to meet GNG based on the sources in the article in any case (if barely). Insert CleverPhrase Here 20:17, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in this case, NAD actually doesn't apply. Lepricavark (talk) 00:43, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.